Improving Lithium-ion Batteries
Dr. Nikhil Koratkar
Battery Research in the Koratkar Lab at
RPI
Materials Science and Nanotech
November 20, 2015
Battery technology is
becoming increasingly important to our society. Instead of using batteries to
only power simple electronics, we are attempting to engineer better batteries
that can power cars, houses, and advanced technology such as cell phones and computers.
Since 2012, research in the Koratkar Lab has led to discoveries that improve
lithium-ion batteries.
While trying to improve
batteries one must consider the charge rate, power/energy density, and weight
of the battery. By improving the charge rate, the battery can reach full charge
faster. By increasing the energy density. the battery can last longer by
storing more energy. In order to be used in portable technology such as phones,
the battery must be light weight. By improving these areas a better battery can
be made. Although, making improvements means finding a balance between all of
the different factors.
At RPI, Dr. Koratkar
focused on improving the electrode material within lithium-ion batteries. Since
the cathode is made of lithium cobalt oxide and it works very well, he focused mainly
on improving the anode which consists of sheets of graphene (layers of graphite
that are just one atom thick). When the battery is discharged, lithium ions
from the cathode migrate to the graphene. When the batter is recharged, the
lithium ions return to the cathode. Inherently, the graphene sheets can only
accept a limited amount of lithium ions. So to improve the battery, one can add
more graphene, or find a way to get the graphene to accept more Lithium ions.
Dr. Kortakardeveloped a process that creates an open pore structure within the
sheets of graphene. This creates more space to store the lithium ions and more
surface area for the ions to diffuse into the graphene.
Process
Step 1: allow the graphite to undergo
oxidation for 96 hours
Step 2: Ultrasonicate the graphene oxide
in water to get graphene oxide paper
Step 3: Remove the oxygen and some
carbon (CO2) by using a thermal shock (quickly heat to 700 degrees
Celsius for 45 seconds); this thermal shock can also be delivered by photons
(similar to a camera flash)
As the thermal shock
removes CO2 it creates vacancies or defects in the carbon structure
of the graphene (the C in the CO2 comes from the graphene). The thermal shock also disrupts the graphene
structure making it porous. After testing this new material in the lab it was
discovered that the capacity greatly increased. The original capacity of the
graphite sheets was 370 mAh/g while the capacity of the new porous graphene
sheets was 900 mAh/g. This means the new material can hold many more lithium
ions in the anode. The reason for this is in the traditional material (graphite
sheets) when the positive lithium ions combined with electrons in the anode
they did not want to stick to the graphite sheets so they just hovered between
them. Since the new material has vacancies, when the lithium ions diffuse into the
new material they stick in the spots where the vacancies are. In comparison,
the traditional material was LiC6 while the new material is Li3C8.
This research in the lab showed that the more defective the anode material (up
to a certain point) is the higher the capacity/ energy density.
In addition to improving
the energy density, Dr. Koratkar improved
the charge rate. Charging a battery is limited by how fast the lithium ions
diffuse into the anode. In the porous material the ions can diffuse everywhere
instead of just on the edge like the original graphite sheets. This means the
battery can be charged for less time because the ions diffuse faster. This was
proven when the charge time was decreased to 24 seconds and the power density
increased. Ideally, thisporous anode could eventually be optimized to the point
that it could be used to start a car. Since
a lot of power is needed to start a car, in order to use a battery it must have
a very high power density in a short amount of time. However, in order to apply
this to a realistic situation the volume of the battery had to be normalized.
So, in the lab the defected graphene was compressed to a realistic size for an
anode. The compression closed some cracks and pores so when a charge was
applied the power density was not as great but the energy density was still
high. This shows that while designing a new idea some desired results may be
compromised. In this case, normalizing volume is not good for graphene when a
high power density is desired.
Concepts/
Vocabulary
Energy density- The amount of energy stored in a given system or
region of space per unit volume or mass
Power density- the amount of power per unit volume
Power=energy/time
Economies of scale- a proportionate savings in cost gained by an
increased level of production
Example: The cost of implementing the
process to make graphene porous is justified by the increase in production of
these new lithium-ion batteries. (In
this case we would want to produce morebecause they have more advantages then
traditional lithium-ion batteries)
Oxidation- combining with oxygen; electrons are lost
Ultrasonicate in water- breaks open the graphene oxide into layers with an
ultrasound and water
-Phones need a battery to last 1,000
charge cycles while cars need a battery that can last 10,000 charge cycles
-Patent ideas first then publish
-Ideas are useful but in order to be
used in production for manufacturing they must be able to be scaled up
-for the production of drones the
battery that powers them must be light weight
Government:
Funding for researching lithium-ion
technology comes from grants (National Science Foundation, and NY State energy
research development authority)
Connections
SME project/Mr. Chiappone: Scaling up; high rate manufacturing at low costs
Materials Science and Engineering/ Professors
Ed Palermo and Chaitanya Ullal: The
concept of vacancies in materials; Structure defines function
Dr. Linhardt: scaling up ideas that work on the small scale; using
grants to fund research; patenting ideas in order to publish them
Mr. Silva: Improving a traditional version of an idea to make
it work better; scaling up ideas for large scale production
Ms. Moldoff: utilizing grants/funding from the government
No comments:
Post a Comment